Author : Oinam Gokulchandra Singh, Salam Anupama, Honnegowda Thittamaranahalli Muguregowda, Abdullah M Al Shahrani, Mosa M. Almutairi, Abdullah Sulaiman Almadhi, Turki Qaryan Alanazi, Sultan Saad Albugami, Fayaz Ul Haq, Smily Jesu Priya Victor Paulraj, Hosam Alharthi, Tamam Alenazi
Date of Publication :31st May 2024
Abstract: Background: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) represents a significant advancement in CT imaging.
However, with the increasing frequency of repeated CT examinations, concerns about cumulative radiation exposure arise. Minor
variations in patient positioning, scan length, and technical parameters between follow-up scans can influence dose. This study aimed to
investigate the variability in radiation dose among serial abdominal CT examinations performed using MDCT scanners using the same
scanner with a standardized scanning protocol.
Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the King Abdullah
International Medical Research Centre (KAIMRC). Data on the computed tomography dose index volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length
product (DLP) were retrospectively extracted, compiled, and analyzed for 140 patients (100 males, 40 females) who underwent two
consecutive non-contrast Abdomen CT (AB-CT) examinations between January 2022 and June 2023. All scans were performed on the
same MDCT system Philips, equipped with automated exposure control, using data retrieved from the RIS/PACS database at the Medical
Imaging CT Unit, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Results: This study found no statistically significant variation in radiation dose metrics between the two CT scans.; mean CTDIvol
decreased from 33.27 to 31.26 mGy and DLP from 894.33 to 829.34 mGy·cm. technical parameters, including tube voltage, exposure
time, table height, and slice thickness, showed minimal, non-significant variation, indicating consistent scanning protocols across both
visits.
Conclusion: The analysis confirmed no significant differences in radiation dose or scan parameters between the two follow-up CT
visits. These findings suggest consistent application of imaging protocols and effective use of dose management strategies, including
automated exposure control on the MDCT scanner.
Reference :