Author : Liu Li 1
Date of Publication :13th December 2017
Abstract: This paper applies the Engle-Granger two-step ECM approach to estimate the long-term and short-term relationships between inequality and economic growth for China and India. Our estimation results support the S-shaped curve hypothesis relating GDP per capita to inequality with different starting points for the two countries. We find a positive causal relationship for China, showing that increased income inequality spurred economic growth. Furthermore, we find the same results that the trade openness increased inequality in China and India. As for redistribution, fiscal redistributive measures show a negative effect in China and India. In the inequality-GDP per capita relationship, export show a negative effect in China and had no significant effect in India
Reference :
-
- Agrawal, 2016,Inequality in India: what's the realstory? http://https: //www. weforum. org/agenda /2016/ 10/ inequality-in-india-oxfam-explainer/
- Kuznets, S. (1955]). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
- Chambers, D. (2010]). Does a rising tide raise all ships? The impact of growth on inequality. Applied Economics Letters, 17(6), 581–586.
- Wahiba, N. F., & El Weriemmi, M. (2014]). The relationship between economic growth and income inequality. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(1), 135–143.
- Nissim, B. D. (2007]). Economic growth and its effect on income distribution. Journal of Economic Studies, 34(1), 42–58.
- Forbes, K. J. (2000]). A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. The American Economic Review, 90(4), 869–887.